|
MacGyver Solutions
Wednesday July 12, 2006
Opponents of George Bush -- a.k.a. democrats -- consistently make claims about republicans being totalitarian, or at least authoritarian, and even out to hurt the American people. This couldn't be further from the truth. Why do they make such claims? Here's 5 reasons:
1)War.
They say: The president is warring with other countries, and it is wastefully ending the lives of (a small number of) soldiers.
I say: Bush may be wrong, but he believes with all his heart that he is doing the right thing. I support his decisions concerning our global security.
2)The Press.
They say: Any restrictions implied on the press are unconstitutional.
I say: The press shouldn't have the right to publicize anything that could put my life in potential mortal danger any more than they have the right to physically put my life in mortal danger, without penalty -- following due process of course.
3)Outsourcing.
They say: To hell with Big Corporation. Equal pay and mandatory jobs for all.
I say: Where in the Constitution does it say that you are guaranteed a job? Life is tough; it's a lot tougher everywhere else folks -- grow up!
4)Religion.
They say: The Right is trying to force their beliefs on the rest of us.
I say: If there is such a movement, then it has been a long time coming, and you started it when you took prayer out of school -- a time when kids could do things like walk down the street alone at night without having to worry. You still have the right not to participate in any event you find uncomfortable, like prayer or church, but you don't have the right to ask someone, in office or otherwise, to disregard their beliefs just so they won't offend someone. Our President is a professing Christian, just like 50 out of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence; therefore, he will do his best to make decisions as one (but will never be perfect). And good luck getting a married Atheist into the White House.
5)Gay Marriage.
They say: Free country.
I say: It's like white guys trying to join a black fraternity: Give me a break.
| | Posted by Wootay at 2:24 AM - | |
|
|
Tuesday June 20, 2006
Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, there was a war that resulted in the deaths of almost 620,000 soldiers. The cause: difference of opinion. This war was fought between the North and the South. Today, we grow more and more divided, but in a different direction: Left and Right. Is the present simply the past repeated with new variables? If so, is the future up to Fate, or do we have the freedom to shape our own destiny?
Today, we are divided into Republicans and Democrats, rich and poor, north and south (still), public school and private school, .... It's like elementary school all over again: cool guys on that side of the playground, nerdy boys on that side, nerdy girls on that side, popular girls on that side, and if you're not on my side, then you're not invited to my birthday party ::sticking tongue out::
I find the other people like me among the Republican group, but I can easily get along with a Democrat -- so long as we don't talk politics. I mean, obviously if we have two very different ideas about the direction of our country, then we would only butt heads, the outcome of which would not change either's opinions, and we both know it.
Still, all of the people I know who own businesses vote Republican so that they will continue to receive government incentives to increase sales and increase profits. And most of the people who work for someone else vote Democrat because they're mad at their boss for not paying them more, and perhaps legislation could deliver them their retribution, afterall, they just moved into a new house that cost more than they'll make in the next 5 years, and the little woman just found out why she's been getting sick every day for the last week, so they vote for someone who'll get them their unearned piece of the pie -- somebody's pie, baked by somebody, in an oven that somebody bought or built from scratch.
As it is, business owners earn 5 times as much as their employees, and they are able to write things off their taxes in 27 different categories that employees do not. Here's an idea: instead of voting for someone who'll take those benefits away from everyone, why not just start a business so you can take advantage of those benefits, and vote for someone who'll help you keep more of your money during tax season?
You know who calls stuff like that "being dirty" or "hiding money"? Broke people. You know who calls it "being smart with your money"? Rich people. I see all these people on TV with their degrees and diplomas and their ultra-knowledge and liberal opinions, and, "you know," I think to myself, "those PhD's and $1.05 will get you a hamburger off the dollar menu." When it comes to intelligence, I believe the 5th grade dropout with a six-figure income -- in his own business -- is smarter than the chemical engineer with a five-figure income. Do you disagree?
| | Posted by Wootay at 4:14 AM - | |
|
|
Thursday June 15, 2006
How will the war finally end? A new candidate will emerge who says that if he is elected, we will begin to remove U.S. troops from other countries throughout the world, but that the United States absolutely will not tolerate attacks onto its land or its people and that any future attacks will have identical repercussions as this administration has implemented. He will be elected and this is what we'll do. Afterall, a police officer eventually gets his knee out of a suspect's back and let's him stand up off the gravel -- handcuffed -- and they are simply civilian soldiers; we can implement the same scenario on a global scale. *
And by the way, why are politicians such [meow]ies these days? If a senator wants to say something bad about Bush or Republicans, they use "this administration." If someone is going to imply something negative about me in front of millions of people who voted for me because they believed that I could lead them to a better life, I want them to say my name when they're talking about me, not sugarcoat their insults with generalizations or anonymity, or use sass to sarcasticly put me down while wearing a smile.
*don't get me wrong, I am pro-war, and I trust the president has set guildelines in his own mind concerning the requirements which need to be surpassed in order for the troops' removal, and if he says that those requirements have yet to be met then they have not yet been met; but I'm sure we will one day keep peace by simply standing on our shores and simply standing firm, with the leaders of homicide conspiracies cowering in their caves, or settled in their graves.
| | Posted by Wootay at 5:28 AM - | |
|
|
Tuesday June 6, 2006
Today was June 6, 2006.
I have not seen the Omen -- the one that came out today -- but if it's anything like the others, I'll see it.
But not today. And probably not this month, but when it makes its way to the movie rental place, I'll go into the store and, well, look at the cover and think about renting it, but I won't.
I'll wait until it goes to video, and then I'll wait until it goes to the library. Then I'll take my library card and rent a movie so I can get some of my tax money's worth back from the government.
Afterwards, though, I'm sure I'll have to go to sleep with the lights on and one eye open, or cuddled up to my Bible in front of the fireplace, or in my car on the road to my friend's house in another state.
Well, another date in history has come and gone. And like New Years 2000, the world has not come to an end. Do good things with your lives.
| | Posted by Wootay at 11:58 PM - | |
|
|
Tuesday May 30, 2006
I just watched a police documentary show -- not to mention any names -- and the officer being filmed rolled up on an all-too-common situation that involved an elderly person, a car, and their indifference to the potential accident threat that they posed.
This particular old woman had driven about 30 feet up some railroad tracks and had gotten her car stuck on top of the rails. When asked what had happened, she said she didn't know.
Now I ask you, does this person really need to be behind the wheel ever again?
My grandmother -- great woman and at 83 she is still as full of life as ever -- attempted to learn to drive a few years ago after her husband died. Long story short, she drove the car from a gas station at full speed across 6 lanes of traffic, survived, and crashed into some parked cars in the car lot across the street, thus ending her driving career -- oh, and she only had a permit at the time.
My grandfather, before he died, couldn't see for crap towards the end of his career, and it even got to the point to where he scared himself driving. I was with them once when he thought he was on the road but instead he was headed for the woods across a gravel parking lot/construction area.
Now, at 23, I drive like a crazy man on the highway, but I believe I am fully in control of the car -- with the exception of events that are out of my control such as glass or nails on the road, or a hopeful deer. But as for elderly people, whose reactions have delayed, whose sight has faded, whose memory is getting duller -- they should not be allowed to renew their driver's licenses.
But, keeping in mind that (God willing) you're going to be that age one day, what age should it be revoked?
| | Posted by Wootay at 1:50 AM - | |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4
| |
Have you checked out the
new Blogstream site,
Question Stream.com?
Many Blogstream members are there
already! Quotes from members: "It's like blog lite!" -- "I like the instant
gratification!" -- "Stop spectating, get in the game!"
If you have not joined in, you are really missing out!
|
|
637 Visitors
|